Books!: Geo. Washington’s Secret Six

One of my recent areas of fascination, in addition to everything else, and inspired almost wholly by AMC’s (fantasmagorical) TURN: Washington’s Spies, has been the story of the Culper Spy Ring (link 2) (link 3). I wrote a thing a while ago about the cinematography of the show, which for me is a huge part of the attraction, but the storylines are pretty compelling as well.

Thus, imagine my excitement when, at the library, I came across this book titled George Washington’s Secret Six: The Spy Ring that Saved the American Revolution. It is not the book on which the show is based, but had a short line between this book and the basis for the show, with a lot of artistic license thrown in for cinematic reasons.


To the best of my ability, I will refrain from doing a comparison with the show, because the show and this book aren’t really related outside of the fact that they occupy the same realms. It would be like me trying to evaluate you based on a run-in with one of your cousins, and that wouldn’t be fair to anybody.

Without further ado, the book:

I found it to be a nice introduction and overview of the Culper Ring, the collective name of the group of men and women who spied for Washington. Kilmeade is not a scholar by trade so the writing was quite narrative and therefore a quick read. There was some speculation, not supported by evidence, that made me scratch my head, but I could overlook those parts. There were other parts of the story that he thought would be better presented with dialogue. For example, one scene between Culper, Sr. and Culper, Jr. included shouting and frantic pacing. It reminded me of Monuments Men, which was also written by a non-academic and also included recreated dialogue.

One thing that still astounds me is how these people from humble parts were able to change the tide of the war. For example, Samuel Culper, Sr., real name Abraham Woodhull, was a farmer on the north shore of Long Island. Excepting the trips he took into New York to see his sister, how on earth would he have come across any useful information to give to Washington?

The Culpers: sketch of Robert Townsend by himself, artists interpretation of Abraham Woodhull.


I might have heard of the Culper Ring once or twice in passing, like in that episode of White Collar where the protagonists had to track down the modern descendants of the original ring to solve a crime. Even watching TURN never quite impressed the truly pivotal role they played, because I attributed the suspense and theatrics to good television writing that took generous liberties with historical fact. But after reading this book, George Washington’s Secret Six, I’ve hardly begun to realize the pivotal roles and plots they were involved in:


In White Collar, the modern descendants of the Ring assemble.

Plot One: They prevented a British counterfeiting scheme that would have destroyed the fledgling colonial economy. (My knowledge of economics is that I like it when I get paid and I’m sad when I don’t, so I don’t entirely understand this particular plot.) Plot Two: They stopped an ambush of sorely needed French allies coming to Washington’s Aid. Plot Three: They uncovered Benedict Arnold’s treachery before he was able to hand West Point over to the British. Plot Four: They smuggled an entire book of British naval signals to the French fleet, who was then able to negate any naval advantage the British might have had, leading to the British surrender at Yorktown.


General Benedict Arnold

It was fascinating to see how each individual member played their part, how one part played into the next, and how all the parts came together to form one superb intelligence-gathering machine.

The book’s prologue and post-script also framed the entire story around the discovery of the identity of Samuel Culper, Jr., which happened in 1929. A researcher, Morton Pennypacker, noticed similarities between Culper, Jr.’s handwriting and one Robert Townsend’s papers. Townsend had gone to the grave without revealing his vital role in the Revolution, but handwriting analysis confirmed the connection. From what I can infer, once Townsend’s identity was revealed, all the disparate research surrounding the Ring snapped into place and the entire operation came into focus. In some ways, Townsend was the central figure of the Ring – he and his business partner James Rivington certainly had the best positioning to be of good value – and so he became the central figure of the book with which the other members interacted like spokes on a wheel.


The fictional ring, from TURN, which is probably from Season 1 as it lacks Robert Townsend. 98.3% of these people existed but their on-screen representations are quite different than their real selves.

Lastly, learning of the Ring’s modern impact (besides the fact that we won the war) was simply fascinating. Kilmeade and his co-author Don Yeager had visited the CIA headquarters in Langley, VA, while researching for this book. They were told that, though the Culper Ring has no physical monument or memorial, it still lives on today because the tactics employed by the Ring – secret codes, dead drops, aliases, compartmentalizing of information, gadgetry – were so effective they’re still worth emulating.


Culper’s occupational descendant?

Overall, much like the Shaara novels of historical events, George Washington’s Secret Six summarizes the topic and creates a structure from which someone might delve further into study. I have no real knowledge of the content so I am unable to judge the book by its historicity, but some other reviews, listed below in the Further Reading section, all seem to agree that this book is more-or-less close enough but takes some pretty fanciful liberties with interpretation and extrapolation in places. Despite that, I enjoyed it and the purported inaccuracies obviously mean I have to go read some more to set myself straight.

Further Reading;


Image Source:

Image Source

Image Source

Image Source

Image Source

Image Source

Image Source



Filed under Uncategorized

4 responses to “Books!: Geo. Washington’s Secret Six

  1. May I simply just say what a relief to discover someone
    that actually knows what they’re discussing on the web.
    You certainly realize how to bring a problem to light and make
    it important. A lot more people need to check this out and understand this side of the story.
    It’s surprising you aren’t more popular since you certainly
    have the gift.

  2. Thanks! that was very informative and certainly adds another aspect to this story!

  3. Miguel Hernandez

    Reporting to Jay was another Westchester County resident, Elijah Hunter who served as a “double agent” He was born on August 4, 1749 in the Town of Cortlandt Manor on a farm near the Village of Bedford. After the Revolutionary war he settled in the Town of Mt Pleasant where the Village of Ossining now stands and he died on December 22, 1815 in New York City.
    Hunter led an eventful life particularly during the Revolution. Early in the War Elijah Hunter, served as lieutenant and as captain of Grenadiers at the Battle of White Plains. He was also a delegate to the Assembly of Westchester County. However, his most important service was a civilian when he supervised a network of counterintelligence agents operating in the Fishkill in Dutchess County He later worked for the American side as a spy and double agent in New York City and there exists a number of letters and other related documents in the George Washington papers that reference Hunter’s role as a secret agent. One of these is Washington’s letter to Hunter in which the General attaches exaggerated information about the strength of the American forces in the lower Hudson valley area. He intended that it fall into the hands of the British and force them to keep a large force pinned down in New York City to defend the it and unavailable to assist General John Burgoyne’s forces who were marching down from Canada.
    “Inclosed (sic) you will find a return of the troops fit for duty under my immediate command. For the reasons I mentioned to you the other day I have not the least objection to our real strength being known, and it will be well for you to inform that you came by the knowledge of it from inquiry and your own observations of the troops when under arms upon which you formed an average estimate of the force of each regiment in the different Brigades; to give your account, the greater air of probability you may observe that the Officers are very incautious in speaking of the strength of their regiments. “
    In a follow up letter to General Robert Howe who would later confront Burgoyne at Saratoga, NY and environs, Washington refers to Hunter as number “95” in some correspondence and as “Mr. H” in others. Of Hunter’s capacity as a double agent Washington writes:
    “…do not conceive it would be expedient in you to drop the smallest hint by which he could discover the tendency of these inquiries, much more the time and manner of execution, if these should be the result of them, considering him as a double character, ( emphasis added) it is more than possible he would give some intimation by which the project would be ruined, if otherwise it bid fair for success.
    Moreover, in a letter to General Mc Dougall he states:
    ” I have had a good deal of conversation with Mr. H-——. He appears to be a sensible man capable of rendering important service, if he is sincerely disposed to do it. From what you say, I am led to hope he is; but nevertheless, if he is really in the confidence of the enemy, as he himself believes to be the case, it will be prudent to trust him with caution and to watch his conduct with a jealous eye. I always think it necessary to be very circumspect with double spies.”
    All counted there are at least six letters during the war in which Washington mentions Hunter to others or corresponds directly with him.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s